
Air medical transport is beneficial as it provides a higher level of medical care to the patient during travel from Mumbai to New York and also provides a speedier response in case of medical emergencies.
Speed and Injury Protection for Travellers in Mumbai
Helicopter air ambulances are used for the transport of patients from the scene of an injury to a hospital, and for shorter flights between smaller hospitals and trauma centers to specialty hospitals (burn or cardiac centers, for instance). Fixed wing air ambulances (airplanes) are used for transporting patients on longer inter-hospital flights.
Air medical transport is beneficial not only because it provides a higher level of medical care to the patient en-route, but also because it allows for a speedier response. When treating the critically ill or injured, it is always important to minimize the time that patients are out of a hospital and away from a physician’s direct care. Helicopters fly point-to-point, reducing the time out of the hospital, and avoiding the traffic delays experienced by ground ambulances. Fixed wing air ambulances (airplanes) can cover much more distance in less time than a ground ambulance. Sometimes the air ambulance even provides a more comfortable ride, where less than optimal road conditions result in discomfort for some patients.
All aircraft—fifixed wing and helicopter—conduct about 500,000 patient transports in the United States alone each year, saving millions of lives each decade.
Access: Patients isolated from ground EMS or trauma centers by distance, lack of ambulance-passable roads and by terrain features such as mountains, canyons, forests, and islands, benefit greatly from air medical service. Helicopter EMS is also a powerful tool in urban/suburban congestion. Bringing patients home and to more sophisticated medical care from distant sites of illness or injury (called “repatriation”) is one primary use of fixed-wing (airplane) air medical service.
A greater number of communities, particularly those in rural areas, are finding themselves cut-off from access to emergency care because of recent changes in the health care delivery system in this country:
◗ Emergency departments in community hospitals have declined from just over 5,000 in 1992 to approximately 4,600 in 2002, a trend that is expected to continue.32
◗ The number of the most sophisticated trauma centers has declined in the same time period.
◗ Specialty care and specialists are increasingly housed in urban specialty centers and are less available in non-urban settings.
◗ Overcrowding of hospital emergency departments and the lack of critical care and specialty beds often causes hospitals to divert EMS patients.
Due to the above factors, AMS, and especially HEMS, is becoming the health care safety net and access point for many non-urban individuals and communities.
The Perfect Coordination: AMS and the Trauma System
The “Golden Hour” concept provides that along the route to the surgeon’s knife in that fifirst hour, a patient should benefit from an organized EMS system which provides increasingly advanced care (e.g., BLS to ALS to the physician-level care provided by air medical crews).
The complete EMS trauma subsystem must include:
◗ Rapid discovery of the injured patient and the notification of EMS.
◗ Fast response of BLS EMS.
◗ Early activation by trained and authorized requesters.
◗ Timely availability of ALS resources.
◗ Rapid access to physician-level intervention through HEMS response or the closest Emergency Department.
◗ Rapid transport to identified trauma centers.
◗ Inter-hospital transfer to needed specialty care by critical care ground ambulance helicopter or fixed wing air ambulance as
◗ Excellent planning and coordination of EMS resources.
◗ Quality assessment of each component in the combined air and ground emergency response.
A recent paper cites the Maryland system as having these components in place and organized well and calls upon other systems to emulate it. It has been well demonstrated that organized trauma systems with trauma centers save lives. In the early 1980s, the first analytical attempts to determine the life-saving impact on mortality by HEMS response to injury scenes began to appear, largely demonstrating reductions in mortality compared with ground systems.
Since the ’80s, there have been many published medical studies which have attempted, through a variety of means, to assess HEMS’ impact on trauma mortality and morbidity for both scenes and inter-facility flights. Overall, these studies have demonstrated the power of HEMS to affect improvements in trauma-related mortality and morbidity.
As a part of an organized trauma system, HEMS cuts the injury-to- operating-room time significantly. Medical helicopters dispatched simultaneously with ground EMS, can give over 54% of the US population access to a full-service trauma center within 60 minutes that they otherwise would not have.
Medical helicopters also discourage time-costly intermediate stops at small, non-trauma center hospitals. Such stops are detrimental to trauma patients, even where HEMS is called from that hospital for the final leg of the trip.
In the future, improvements in cell phone technology and automatic crash notification (ACN) technology in cars may cut the time required to discover and report a crash injury to almost zero. Using “urgency” indicators generated by automatic crash notification data sent from crashed cars to dispatch centers, along with special medical protocols for assessing the probability of severe injury from the crash, will soon provide a rational and effective way for helicopters to be launched within minutes of an accident, no matter how remote, thereby further improving the speed of EMS response to patients.
Recent study findings demonstrate that:
σ Patients severely injured enough to require inter-facility transfer were four times more likely to die after the HEMS serving that area was discontinued.
σ HEMS reduced injury mortality by 24% in a multi-center study with some 16,000 patients in Boston.
σ Even injury patients in urban areas experienced a transport-time benefit by HEMS in 23% of the cases.
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently associated with events causing severe, multiple trauma in patients, and is the leading cause of death and disability in children and in adults in their most productive years.48 As with other significant injuries, treatment of traumatic brain injury is time-critical. Outside of urban areas, the reduced availability of the neurosurgical services required to treat traumatic brain injury has posed a challenge to EMS. Recent studies indicate that early advanced care by air medical crews and air transport to definitive care by a neurosurgeon can overcome this challenge, resulting in significant improvement to moderately and severely traumatic brain injured patients.
HEMS is generally useful in trauma care circumstances such as when:
◗ There is an extended period required to access or extricate a remote (e.g., injured hiker, snowmobiler, or boater) or trapped patient (e.g., in a crashed car) which depletes the time window to get the patient to the trauma center by ground.
◗ Distance to the trauma center is greater than 20 to 25 miles.
◗ The patient needs medical care and stabilization at the ALS level, and there is no ALS-level ground ambulance service available within a reasonable time frame.
◗ Traffic conditions or hospital availability make it unlikely that the patient will get to a trauma center via ground ambulance within the ideal time frame for best clinical outcome.
◗ Multiple patients will overwhelm resources at the trauma center(s) reachable by ground within the time window.
◗ EMS systems require bringing a patient to the nearest hospital for initial evaluation and stabilization, rather than by-passing those facilities and going directly to a trauma center. This may add delay to definitive surgical care and necessitate HEMS transport to mitigate the impact of that delay.
◗ There is a mass casualty incident.
In rural and frontier areas, HEMS and fixed-wing aircraft play a particularly important role.
◗ Where the nearest ground ambulance is further, by travel- time, from the scene of injury than the nearest HEMS, the air medical service may be the primary ambulance for critically ill and injured patients in that area.
◗ Where the nearest ALS-capable medical facility is further, by travel-time, from the scene of the injury that is a HEMS or a fixed-wing provider, the air medical service may be the primary ALS provider for critically ill or injured patients in that area.
◗ Where blood supplies or availability of other medical supplies or equipment are limited or non-existent, jeopardizing the care of the patient, the air medical service can bring these resources to the hospital with the patient.
◗ The air medical service can transport specialized medical staff (surgical, emergency medicine, respiratory therapy, pediatric, neonatal, obstetric, and specialized nursing staff ) to assist with a local mass casualty event or to augment the rural/frontier hospital’s staff in stabilizing patients needing specialized care before transport.
Fixed Wing Aircrafts
Fixed wing aircraft are mainly utilized for transportation of a patient from a smaller airstrip in a small town to large city airports where they are admitted for higher treatment.
Fixed Wing Aircrafts could be a Turboprop Aircrafts like the King Air B 200 or Pilatus PC 12 or Jet Aircraft like the Citation Jet or a Learjet.
It could also be a large jet like the Challengers or Gulfstreams which can fly between continents to take critical patients to their home country.
For the patient who can afford - we can organize the patient transfer on a Business Boeing Jet.
If you need an Air Ambulance from Mumbai to New York - Do get in touch with us. If urgent - Call Us or Email us and we promise to respond back immediately.
Give us the exact location of the patient at Mumbai - the medical report and we promise to provide the best solution to transporting your loved one to
New York in the most affordable manner.
When Time is Life
Your Partner in Travel
From Mumbai to New York